home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT1053>
- <title>
- May 11, 1992: Reviews:Books
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- May 11, 1992 L.A.:"Can We All Get Along?"
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 62
- BOOKS
- A Dirge for American Democracy
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By WALTER SHAPIRO
- </p>
- <p> TITLE: Who Will Tell the People
- AUTHOR: William Greider
- PUBLISHER: Simon & Schuster; 464 pages; $25
- </p>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: The system is in crisis, and the
- politicians are not the only ones to blame.
- </p>
- <p> William Greider has all the credentials to be another
- Inside-the-Beltway TV-talk-show bore serving up sound-bite-size
- portions of predictable punditry. Back in 1972 when he was
- covering the McGovern campaign, Greider was one of Timothy
- Crouse's original Boys on the Bus. While an editor of the
- Washington Post, he prompted David Stockman's explosive 1981
- confessions that Reaganomics was a fraud. A dogged reporter
- undeterred by smoke-and-mirrors complexity, Greider plumbed the
- depths of the Federal Reserve in his 1987 best seller, Secrets
- of the Temple.
- </p>
- <p> But in sharp contrast to his counterparts in the
- Washington journalistic firmament, Greider boasts the
- temperament, outlook and career trajectory of an angry outsider.
- For one thing, he writes these days for Rolling Stone, a
- publication rarely confused with, say, the New Republic.
- Greider's stance also sets him apart from both Establishment
- toadies and partisan true believers, for he is a jaded idealist
- almost as disgusted with tepid reformers as he is with the
- hoard-the-wealth excesses of the Reagan and Bush
- administrations.
- </p>
- <p> Who Will Tell the People sets out to explain precisely how
- and why American democracy has washed up on the shoals of
- cynicism. The complaint may sound familiar, but such a brief
- precis does not do justice to either the freshness of Greider's
- argument or the ambition of his approach. For this is not a book
- about negative campaign spots, the corruption of political fund
- raising or the self-destructive follies of the Democratic Party.
- To Greider these are merely symptoms of a much larger malady --
- the systematic disenfranchisement of average Americans from the
- business of running their country.
- </p>
- <p> The once vibrant institutions that gave the little guy a
- fair shake and a share of the action in the New Deal era have
- atrophied into empty shells: political parties, labor unions and
- working-class newspapers. Taking their place, Greider
- provocatively argues, are the cool, rational tools of
- by-the-numbers policy analysis, the legacy of "the energetic
- reform movements launched by Ralph Nader and others in the
- 1960s." Much like the Progressives early in the century, the
- Naderite reformers distrusted the messiness of mass democracy
- and placed their faith instead in public-interest litigation and
- legislation. But in another illustration of the law of
- unintended consequences, business interests learned how to
- dominate these newly cerebral public policy debates, while
- average citizens became dangerously alienated from the
- two-party governing class in Washington.
- </p>
- <p> Greider's sympathies rest with the enduring "native
- American skepticism of elites." He singles out for praise
- modern-day community organizers, the heirs of Saul Alinsky,
- fighting for power in the old-fashioned face-to-face style of
- urban political machines. His moral: "The nation is alive with
- positive, creative political energies" that never find an outlet
- in national elections. Yet Greider is too much the realist
- (covering 20 years of quixotic presidential campaigns inevitably
- dampens one's dreams) to map out much of a battle plan for John
- and Jane Doe to regain control of the levers of national power.
- </p>
- <p> The book's one flaw -- oddly enough, given its thesis --
- is that Greider works too hard to achieve a rationally
- analytical prose style. His one first-person chapter on
- newspapers (winningly contrasting his early days on the
- blue-collar Cincinnati Post with the mature Ivy League-dominated
- Washington Post) serves as a road-not-taken reminder that in the
- struggle to express ideas -- as well as in the battle for
- political rectitude -- personal experience beats position papers
- hands down.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-